 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
01-24-2011, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Back damage aside, that 10 is one hell of a nice looking card. The 30's just ok looking. I think that pricing makes sense. I've heard many people on here say, "buy the card, not the holder", and in this case I'd have to agree. I mean if I had that kind of money to throw around, I'd go with the 10. If I were to save up for one of these cards, I'd obviously save the $100 and go with the cheap one. It's all in the buyer's perspective, everyone's different.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
| WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
| Whats the story on grading when there is paper loss? | cobblove | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-08-2009 03:50 PM |
| border chipping vs paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-06-2008 02:40 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |
Threaded Mode