|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted I think it's human nature to be biased towards the older players, particularly where today's players are largely so inaccesible and unappealing.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maz isn't in the Hall solely because of the homerun. He was in because he played second base like he belonged in a higher league. Back in the day when only a few games were on national tv, you had to follow the NL to notice. Thus, there might be some American League fans out there who aren't fully wise to all of Maz's accomplishments in the field. I never saw Marty Marion, so I would have to defer to people who followed the National League back in the 40's.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I love the HOF debate...I could read through the rationale from all of our perspectives all night. This thread veered toward the hallowed halls pretty quickly.
The OP didn't mention that the most overrated pre-war player had to be a Hall of Famer, so I went with Chase. But Jeff...as I assumed you might respond, the fascination w/Chase is indeed the irony that if he wanted to be among the heroes instead of villians, by most accounts he likely could have been. And while any of the banned players make good copy...they might be a better fit for the purer definition of over-rated. Chase may be rated about right...a good player and a very bad man. Fred McMullin? Chick Gandil? Reflecting on debatable HOFers is also a bit ironic. When discussing Maranville, Haines or Geo. Kelly for example...none of us "rate" them high at all. In fact they could be considered overrated by the HOF, but not by us, the readers of this forum! Still, I guess they are rated higher than guys like Lou Criger, Bill Bergen or Freddy Parent...those are real bums
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd like to submit Andy Cooper as the Negro League entry.
But this thread loses credibility by the fact that Sisler was even mentioned in it. I don't care that his career OBP was .379, which is not as horrible as some are trying to argue it is. If that was the only category careers were judged by, then I would agree that he should not be in the Hall. Fortunately, it is not. His career BA was .340. Three-freakin-forty! He batted over .400 twice. He also led the league in stolen bases 4 times. It's true that he didn't walk a lot, because he was too busy hitting the ball. For those who actually watch the game of baseball, there are many situations where a hit is infinitely better than a walk. With less than two outs and a runner on first, would you rather have the next batter be a guy who walks a lot or a guy who hits .340? Runners don't advance from first to third on walks. Unless they are Rickey Henderson. I'm a statistics nerd as much as anyone here, but baseball is not a home run derby. Offensive statistics should not be the only measure of a player's worth. Most board members would make the absolute worst general managers in the world because they'd assemble teams without ever considering defense. Their ace pitchers would have horrible stats from all the balls that would drop behind them due to lack of range in the outfield instead of being caught. Plus all the singles that good infielders would have turned into outs. Not to mention all the inning-ending double plays that would instead result in 3 or 4 run rallies. Defense matters. What is it that wins in the playoffs? Is it pitching and on-base percentage? Bill Mazeroski was the best defensive second baseman of all-time. Unless his career average was under .180, anyone who is considered the best ever at his position means he's a legit HOFer to me. In the 1960s Maz led the league in assists 9 times! Think of how many of those outs might have been hits. Turning hits into outs helps you win games. Along those lines, Omar Vizquel should absolutely be a HOFer as well. Forget about his 2,800 hits and 400 stolen bases. No one has ever played more games at shortstop and he has the highest fielding percentage in history outside of future HOFer, Troy Tulowitzki who has played 2,000 fewer games. Also, for you guys who only judge players by stats, why does Dizzy Dean never get brought up in these discussions? Go look at his career stats. You'll be shocked. -Ryan |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dean and Koufax are two anomalies -- stretches of five or so dominant years but way short on career wins. Ed Walsh is sort of similar, his career win total wasn't that impressive. Interestingly, Dwight Gooden was sort of Koufax in reverse, starting with a run of five or so great years and then falling off a cliff, but nobody thinks of him as a HOFer.
As to Sisler, I never suggested he did not belong in the HOF, and neither did Bill James, my only suggestion was that he was overrated in the sense some consider him one of the very few best players ever.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was just going thru the Baseball Encyclopedia and never noticed how pathetic Tommy McCarthy's stats were. Why is he a HOF'er? 2 spots lower on the page is Tim McCarver and he beats him in EVERY category but 1 and no one even sniffs McCarver for the HOF (and at a tougher position too, catcher over OF)???
__________________
I Remember Now.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are a lot of intangibles that go into somebody getting into the HOF. You just don't see it in the stats, that's why I'm not a big fan of the Bill James statistical analysis.
Some players were great fielders. Some had 3-4 huge seasons which made them famous. Some guys were good, not great, but played 20 years. Some were great leaders of men, who elevated the level of play around them. It's hard to look back and really understand exactly what made them great, but it's fun to try. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Everyone's dissing the HOFers from Arkansas
Lou Brock, Dizzy Dean, Arky Vaughn, etc. Who's next, Bill Dickey? Brooks Robinson?
Last edited by tbob; 01-19-2011 at 04:56 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bill Dickey and Brooks Robinson
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The real Anthony would never make a comment like that.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, in retrospect I think that clothing line I launched with my social security number woven into the insignia may have been a mistake.
Last edited by Anthony S.; 01-19-2011 at 07:29 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Huge Vintage Pre War/ Tobacco Clearance on Sportsbuy | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 6 | 03-11-2009 07:32 PM |
| New Vintage Pre War Auctions On Sportsbuy ending Sunday | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2009 10:06 AM |
| Boxing type card "set" - mostly pre war | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 11-11-2008 06:00 PM |
| wtb jennings pre war | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 06-30-2007 03:53 PM |
| Best book or source to learn about pre war cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-13-2006 12:11 AM |