 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
11-07-2010, 08:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
It may be that they are not sure what size they were at the time of issue. So many have been trimmed that they may fear all have been altered to some degree. Also, the red ones are smaller than the black ones, creating even more confusion. They may feel it's better to be cautious than to risk a big problem down the road.
I know SGC has given a numerical grade to some, but they too may find one that they can't be sure is original. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peck & Snyder 1869 address - FINALLY !!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-02-2004 09:04 PM |
| Dating the Peck & Snyder "Creighton" Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-24-2004 11:43 AM |
| Peck & Snyder once again... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-23-2004 10:17 PM |
| Peck & Snyder UPDATE !! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-14-2004 02:58 PM |
| 1869 Peck & Snyder Observation & Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 79 | 07-11-2004 03:51 PM |
Threaded Mode