 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25
10-04-2010, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
How does CC evade criminal prosecution? From what I understand, they provide a refund to anyone who complains that an autograph is bogus without any hassle -- thereby protecting themselves from an actual theft accusation. I believe they then turn around and charge the consignor of said bogus merchandise a "returned item" fee.
They only stay in business by playing the odds - that A) most people can't determine a real autograph from a fake one, B) trust the CC cert actually means something or C) don't want to spend the money to send the autograph to a real authenticator. By my estimation, 95 percent of CC autograph buyers should be demanding a refund. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New E121 (Series of 80) Variation (HOFer Harry Hooper)?? | rhettyeakley | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-12-2009 09:10 PM |
| Hooper Deceptive Business Practices Case (Pennsylvania) | Dalkiel | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-01-2009 04:33 PM |
| Harry Hooper T207 Autographed Display | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-03-2007 07:18 PM |
| Show me your Roger Connor | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 08-07-2007 05:39 PM |
| Follow-up on Roger Neufeldt | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-24-2002 05:34 AM |
Threaded Mode