![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The card looks like it's been soaked once already, otherwise how did they get most of the paper off? Doing a 2nd soaking is taking a big risk, IMO. To me, it has the appearance of a card with a lot of glue residue on there, but not much paper. The residue is harder to get off and you are likely to start losing some of the top layer of the backing. It's still readable as is. Corner wear and any creasing make it riskier to get it wet again, also. It would be a shame to damage the front while trying to slightly improve the back.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More T206 Southern Leaguers / Graded | Bridwell | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 02-21-2010 10:38 PM |
Advice on how to sell my T206 near set/collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-21-2009 02:52 PM |
T206 -- Relative Scarcity or What Autographs Can Tell You | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-27-2009 06:27 AM |
T206 Southern Leaguer advice | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2008 08:13 PM |
graded T206 HOF'ers for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 05-07-2006 01:42 PM |