 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-26-2010, 08:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
2 sides of the coin (or quarter)
Leon, this may or may not help but: if you keep the Wagner and sell the Jackson, you'll get more in return to buy more stuff and still have a great Wagner piece. If you keep the Jackson and sell the Wagner, you'll get less in return but you'll have the best penant in the set. Looks like you win either way!
__________________
I Remember Now. 
|
|
#3
08-26-2010, 08:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would definitely prefer the Jackson over the Wagner.
1. Jackson is available in far fewer sets than Wagner 2. The factory tag is very cool. 3. Maybe it's OCD of me, but I like the straight edges/cut of the Jackson versus the wavy cut of the Wagner. Regardless, they are both incredibly beautiful pieces! Never seen either of those before; thanks for sharing. PS: I am looking for Buck Herzog or Ivy Wingo from this set if anyone has them available. Last edited by peterose4hof; 08-26-2010 at 09:00 AM.
|
|
#4
08-26-2010, 09:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Keep the Jackson as it appears from the scan that the Wagner may have been sewn at one time (the uneven outside borders & it seems like I can see stitch holes (but it is tough to see these in the scan sometimes)). Were they in the same condition I would still probably have gone with the Jackson.
-Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562
|
|
#5
08-26-2010, 09:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Having seen them both first hand in your booth....no brainer........Jackson. Jackson is a much tougher pennant in the set. More Wagners out there from what I've seen. And agree with Rhett as there appears to be some wavyness to the Wags. Also the tab on the back is the coup-de-gras..........
|
|
#6
08-26-2010, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What's up with the white border around Jackson? That really ruins eye appeal for me. And I am biased when I say keep the Wagner.
B
__________________
Giving a loving home to t206 cards that have seen better days...
|
|
#7
08-26-2010, 10:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wags..........but
Normally I would say keep the Wags as I think that most Jackson/Black Sox stuff is vastly overhyped and valued, but the Wags looks to may have been part of a stitched piece before so in this instance I would probably keep the Jax. If both were clean, with centered photos and the like - I would keep the Wags.
|
|
#8
08-26-2010, 10:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wags for me. The JJ pic appears to be miscut? But boy does JJ stuff sell for good money. Sell it, get the farm and still have a nice Wags in the collection.
|
|
#9
08-26-2010, 10:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd go with the Jackson- all of the reasons have already been stated
 Clayton
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do These Joe Jackson Cards Exist? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-08-2013 10:11 AM |
| Reggie Jackson Items - Wanted! Please Help | rocksolid | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-22-2010 07:43 PM |
| BF2 Bonnanza, B18's, E120's, Strips, Collins & McCarthy & More | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 01-30-2009 05:36 AM |
| BF2 Bonnanza, B18's, E120's, Strips, Collins & McCarthy & More | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-22-2009 07:35 PM |
| T210 Old Mill Jackson in REA Auction-New Owner's Perspective | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-11-2005 03:42 PM |
Hybrid Mode
