![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Is a card rebacked if you use the same back? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
59 | 95.16% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 4.84% |
Depends on circumstances |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the only reason to do this is to artificially improve the card, so yes i would considered it as altered and re-backed.
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad card sold by 4_sharp_corners | HBroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2009 04:28 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |
scan manipulation, the latest (at least to me) card scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-05-2002 04:09 PM |