![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
when i figure out what Jason said, i will probably agree! lol
Im not too up on the history so i was unaware the balls, strikes and bounces rules. I do remember the sucky kids used to get 5 strikes in gym class! Does that count?
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
LOL! Maybe that was just the US/Canadian exchange rate back then?????
__________________
Jim Van Brunt Last edited by Jim VB; 08-27-2010 at 06:54 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I used to play "rounders" when I did Civil War reenacting. Yeah, in the 1860's you could catch a hit ball on the first bounce and it was still considered an out. You could also "soak" someone; throw the ball at your opponent and hit them for the out. Does anyone know when these two things disappeared from the rules?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Soaking" was not included among the permissable methods of putting out a baserunner or batter when the National League rule book was written in 1876, so the practise was abolished in 1876 or earlier.
Foul balls caught on one bounce were ruled no longer outs in the revisions of 1883 -- fouls had to be caught on the fly. Oddly, we can't find the revision for fair balls caught on the bound, but presumably it would have been within a year or two of the foul-bounce rule.
__________________
-- the three idiots at Baseball Games https://baseballgames.dreamhosters.com/ https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/baseballgames/ Successful transactions with: bocabirdman, GrayGhost, jimivintage, Oneofthree67, orioles93, quinnsryche, thecatspajamas, ValKehl |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think we can just discount the common players back in the day as garbage and that they were so much worse than todays cream puffs. If anything many were probably much stronger, and definately tougher. I think if they came up today they would call many of the major leaguers a bunch of cry baby pussy cats. We think these guys today are so great but many are actually second rate GARBAGE !! I would like to see them sit on a train, stay in roach infested motels and not get the all star treatment they take for granted and unfortunately get, not to mention a pitcher going longer than 6 or seven innings. Nolan Ryan, David Wells, and other notables would've fit right in 100+ years ago but most others would've been run outta town.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think "Boomer" and the Babe would have been best friends..... drinking buddies!
Didn't he do a Babe impression that was priceless?? I do know Boomer has a lot of respect for the classic game and is a collector.
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Boomer was wearing a game used Babe Ruth hat for awhile and then baseball made him take it off because like everything else these days is LAME !!!
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Continuing the Ty Cobb/Ty Cobb back debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 92 | 01-31-2009 05:50 PM |
Let's continue the T213-1 debate....are they really T206's ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 132 | 07-07-2008 03:52 PM |
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-12-2007 11:10 PM |
Ty Cobb Rookie ?.....let's debate it . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-11-2006 06:15 PM |
Let the debate continue--Greatest Season Performance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 07-08-2005 05:04 AM |