 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-30-2010, 11:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ink
i'm with Leon on this one but i must say that this 'mark'/'writing' issue still is full of ambiguity in the minds of graders---except for perhaps SGC which hates it and grades accordingly no matter how beautiful the card may be.
forgive the obvious 'sour grapes. best, barry 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about Anonymous brown ink T207 back | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-06-2010 05:55 PM |
| Lots of cards for sale...many new cards added and prices lowered! | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-04-2009 08:31 PM |
| Companion Pieces - ink blotters and E94 envelope | rman444 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-25-2009 09:09 AM |
| Ink Bleed on Back of '33 Goudey? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-11-2007 06:19 PM |
| Possibly unique E94 missing ink error-Taking Offers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 05-07-2006 05:09 PM |
Threaded Mode