 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
06-20-2010, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I'd done both- shot them with a 39 megapixel back and lit with studio strobes, and scanned with a canon scanner.
In the end, with equal tweeking in photoshop, it's a tossup. But it's a whole lot easier with the scanner, and if you don't have the proper lighting at your disposal, it's definitely better with the scanner. If you're getting weird highlights from the scanner turn the slab a different direction and try it again- that often helps. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Picture of Wagner PSA 8 before grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 137 | 07-08-2007 12:30 AM |
| Great Scan | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-10-2002 09:10 PM |
| scan manipulation, the latest (at least to me) card scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-05-2002 04:09 PM |
| 1903 Giants mag picture - "premium" description drives up price | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-19-2001 03:43 PM |
| Need A Scan Of Patsy Cahill | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-02-2001 08:13 PM |
Threaded Mode