Dating T206 Cards

[Mikehealer]

It is based on the advertising backs and the "number" of subjects stated on the
back. Those that advertise 150 subjects are dated 1909, 350 subjects are dated 1910 and 350-460 subjects and 460 subjects are dated 1911. All others
that do not designate one of the specific numbers (Hindu, Old Mill, EPDG etc)
are dated 1909-11.

[M's_Fan]

Originally Posted by Mikehealer

It is based on the advertising backs and the "number" of subjects stated on the
back. Those that advertise 150 subjects are dated 1909, 350 subjects are dated 1910 and 350-460 subjects and 460 subjects are dated 1911. All others
that do not designate one of the specific numbers (Hindu, Old Mill, EPDG etc)
are dated 1909-11.

So that's the formula they use, good to know. Yes, I was wondering what formula SGC uses, and also if it is accurate. Sounds like it isn't that simple and sometimes SGC gives it an incorrect date on the label. Thanks!

[joebrandon1977]

Would a 1909 card deemed by SGC be worth more than a 1910 or 1911? And a 1910 be worth more than a 1911?

Assume condition / rating was the same.

I've searched for this, but haven't found much information on it. Will be interested to here some thoughts.

[FrankWakefield]

Joe, I think the straightforward answer to your question is no.


However, the series 150 cards are usually found with slightly more wear. Those cards had more time to be in the pockets of kids when not in their grimy hands. So I can see how someone after all possible backs of a certain player, team, or for a master set might consider a very slight premium for a 150 series card in great condition as to the same front with a 350 series back. Very slight... and only a few people might pay that difference. Generally, the cost differences have nothing to do with the year, it's about the fronts, the backs, the captions, the player, the scarcity...