|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is a best case scenario. However there is still a chance that Pro or CSA would holder it as Gem Mint. The good news is that the graders at SGC will stand behind the grade.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't see how anything in this hobby can shock anyone within the hobby. You would get a Plank graded, no? You don't think a Gem Mint Plank should get more than an ungraded beat-up Plank? It's the same principle with the Rose, except a Gem Plank would sell for a LOTTT more than $80,000.
Last edited by sportscardtheory; 04-30-2010 at 10:32 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm just amazed that people drop this kind of coin to get the highest graded example. Especially because there is a significant likelihood, 1963 not being that far away, that more and more high graded examples will surface. And as many have said, you really can't tell the difference between these high grades, yet people will pay thousands more just because the label says its higher. That is insane to me. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is the nicest Rose rookie I have ever seen.
I'm just sayin'...JimB Last edited by E93; 05-06-2010 at 04:52 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why the quick sale though? Wasnt this card just sold for 26,000 and then put back up for auction in REA and then sold for 19,000. Was this shill biding and then the seller just put it in another auction house. Who just wastes 7 grand like that? You just threw away the money to buy a straight SGC 9 for 7grand buy selling it again. Right?
Last edited by cobblove; 05-06-2010 at 05:28 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why would the PSA 10 go for $80k, but this one for $20k? Odd.
I don't really understand uber high prices for cards that are rare only because of condition. Not only is there no difference between the upper grades to the naked eye, but especially for modern cards where new cards could surface that would grade just as high. As a footnote to this thread that I started, I'm pretty happy with the Rose I picked up in a mixed lot on REA. Just SGC 60, but a heck of a lot cheaper!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1958 Jim Brown ROOKIE PSA 3 (SOLD); 1963 Pete Rose ROOKIE PSA 5 (SOLD) | bobbyw8469 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-18-2010 12:41 PM |
| 1963 Topps Pete Rose PSA/DNA autographed rookie card $425.00 | thenavarro | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-16-2009 02:02 PM |
| N162 Jack Dempsey, 1963 Topps Pete Rose rookie on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 11-25-2007 05:52 AM |
| Pete Rose Rookie Autographed | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 08-18-2007 11:04 AM |
| PSA 7 (High End) 1963 Pete Rose Rookie - $700 (includes insured shipping!). | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-18-2005 12:06 AM |