 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
03-26-2010, 08:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
With marginal examples that I felt could go either way, I have always received back the reply of "Likely Not Genuine". I have found PSA to be very stringent, given my limited experiences using them.
As for the Ruth in question, I do think it's a genuine example of his rather hurried autograph. Not a stellar example of a Ruth, but I have seen many just like this one in the past on Team Balls and in PSA Holders. As stated above, it's not foolproof, but rather a quick opinion, based on the "circumstantial" evidence (and lack of detail) that a computer screen is able to provide. I think it's a pretty good service that has cumulatively saved people a ton of money. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ebay and quick opinion | keithsky | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 02-04-2010 05:45 PM |
| can I get your quick opinion on this Jimmie Foxx? | milkit1 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 16 | 12-16-2009 11:23 AM |
| PSA quick Opinion | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-02-2009 02:48 PM |
| PSA Quick Opinion | Dalkiel | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 06-20-2009 01:09 PM |
| How reliable is the PSA/DNA "Quick Opinion" service on eBay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-18-2005 10:41 AM |
Threaded Mode