|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The doctoring of cards seems to be the natural progression when the commerce side of things has deemed this series too valueable for the hoi polloi.
Not that purists don't remain, nor to say that scholarship hasn't grown since T206 became the province of the wealthy, because both have invariably happened. But isn't it the least bit ironic that Jefferson Burdick, who first gave the set its name and parameters, and got this whole hobby rolling, would today not be able to afford the very Wagner that he hoisted up as the hobby's great scarcity, given his modest income? Michael O'Keefe and Teri Thompson's book The Card hit the nail on the head, and while we look at guys like Bill Maestro as the villains and the Rob Lifsons as the heroes, the truth is, what they have done with the vintage card market has permeated the entire market of cards, so that now even newly-produced baseball cards are out of the reaches of kids, and like Orson Welles pointed out about the fine art world in his film F for Fake (1975), holds true for us in the basball card world, as we no longer have access to the truth about our cardboard's history. It has been clouded by two slabs of plastic and a nefarious price mark-up. I'm sure many don't care, and others would call me a commie or ludite, but so be it. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
With regard to the Hindu Cobb card, hypothesese are being built upon hypothesese here, which is fine, but it is a stretch to say that, just because not many examples of an already-rare back exist in the grading registries or within members of the Net54 community, that none ever really existed at all.
Maybe some cards have been re-backed, but not all specimens can be disregarded, even if there are only two forthcoming. The likelihood of slabs coming off and cards being put into distilled water is low. But Mr. Zanidakis, your knowledge of T206 types is astounding. I hope I didn't derail your thread in any way. I think my skepticism sometimes gets in the way of any progress on either side. Last edited by Brian-Chidester; 02-02-2010 at 09:36 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian- I am skeptical too, and I have my doubts about this Cobb with Red Hindu back. It's just a gut feeling, that's all.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Red Cobb - 26 diff backs....your favorite T206 Cobb is ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 56 | 04-18-2021 08:00 PM |
| Red Cobb survey of all its 30 backs....post your inputs ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 176 | 07-13-2009 04:17 PM |
| Red Cobb survey....re:.PIEDMONT 460/42 enigma ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-26-2009 09:23 PM |
| How rare is the "Ty Cobb Back" card relative to other rare backed Cobbs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-24-2009 09:41 AM |
| T206 Rare Back Cobbs Wanted | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-20-2005 07:47 AM |