![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the numerous reasons why, even though I have never met him, Tedzan is my card collecting hero.
Doug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, I believe these are all of the non-issued Topps card numbers (pre 1990) :
1953 - 253, 261, 267, 268, 271, 275 1955 - 175, 186, 203, 209 1958 - 145 1961 - 426, 587, 588 Let me know if I missed, or am wrong, about any. Doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the kind words. Your #'s are correct. My understanding is that the missing 6 numbered cards in the 1953T set
was due to the Bowman vs Topps conflict (especially regarding Phillies cards). Bowman (being Philly based) prevented Topps from portraying the Phillies stars, Ashburn, Ennis, Konstanty, Roberts, Sim- mons, etc. in their 1953 set. Best regards, TED Z |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great thread, interesting to read. Thanks.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And quite possibly in 1951 as well as there is a Philly connection with the three Topps Major League AS who are short printed: two are Phillies (Roberts, Konstanty) and one was born there (Stanky). The Philly/Bowman connection may also have sunk the Team Card set that year too. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1949 Leaf TED WILLIAMS for Sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-08-2008 07:30 PM |
Looking to buy 1949 Leaf SPs | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-21-2008 03:43 PM |
Predictability of T206 cards with Broad Leaf 350 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-14-2007 12:20 PM |
Basic Differences of 1948 vs 1949 LEAF Sports Sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-14-2005 04:08 PM |
1949 Leaf set - NOT 1948!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 04-11-2005 12:23 PM |