 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
01-13-2010, 07:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I am with Quan
I am with Quan on this one. I don't think it's that bad. I am not a T3 collector but I have noticed grading companies be a bit lenient in grading of large sized cards. I would say it's only 1 grade difference, maybe a 3. If there was a big back scan, upon purchase, then I am not sure there is a lot of room for disgruntlement, maybe a little bit, but not a lot. This is just my own opinion. Ya' gotta do what makes ya' happy.....BTW, I have a nice VG-EX E94 with spots of paper loss on the back, but the front is close to NRMT. ALSO, if I am not mistaking it actually looks like some of those spots of paper loss are not paper loss but extra paper on the card. Maybe some scrapbook paste residue? Those could probably easily be removed.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nice graded card boxes - advice....COMING SOON | jp1216 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-18-2012 03:28 PM |
| Outstanding Graded Card storage case holds up to 150 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-12-2009 07:06 PM |
| 1951 Berk Ross Panels many highest graded SOLD | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 01-18-2008 06:41 PM |
| Exhibits for sale some highest graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 09-20-2007 06:56 PM |
| Graded and Non Graded M116's For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 12-22-2006 06:51 PM |
Threaded Mode