![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my opinion has always been that the more information the better - so a 9oc is much more descriptive than just EX. But in this age of registrys there just seems to be a huge stigma with qualifiers.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 05:09 PM |
Grading Compnay Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-11-2008 03:51 PM |
One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 08:42 AM |
Starting a Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-22-2004 10:57 AM |