 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
11-22-2009, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
T204's
Jamie......re..T204's vs E90's vs T206's ?
While there is a fair amount of Boston NL subjects in the T206 set, there are very few Boston AL subjects in the T206 set (Tris Speaker, notwithstanding). The RAMLY Co's contractual rights to players must of played a major factor in this ? ? Furthermore, the 1908 and 1909 series of the E90-1 set contain virtually no Boston AL subjects or Cinci. subjects in them. And, the RAMLY set is loaded with Boston subjects (for obvious reasons), and a fair amount of Cinci. guys. The E90 set's 1910 series finally has a bevy of Boston and Cinci. subjects. It's my speculation that in 1909 the RAMLY issue affected the the design of the E90 set, also. I look forward to your thoughts on these two factors. TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 11-22-2009 at 07:36 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An Interesting Scorecard - Aug 25th, 1881 | Joe_G. | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 10-07-2009 06:52 PM |
| Interesting & Funny 19th Century Baseball Stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-02-2009 06:21 PM |
| Interesting T206 stamp | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-10-2008 07:27 AM |
| interesting reading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-02-2002 02:57 PM |
| Interesting Story | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-03-2002 05:06 PM |
Threaded Mode