![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
so far. And to be sure, the thread should be titled "rarity". I noticed a few comments suggested pre-war collecting is a "pimple on the ass" compared to other time eras, but isn't that a result of being "priced out"? I would imagine the number of pre-war collectors would increase dramatically if cards cost $5 instead of $50...
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scarcity, Real, Artificial, and Imagined | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 09-23-2007 05:27 PM |
the issue of scarcity re:206 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-25-2006 09:31 PM |
Scarcity vs. Condition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-10-2006 04:38 PM |
T205 Breakdown for back scarcity 2004-05 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-13-2005 05:33 PM |
assessing vintage card scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 07-04-2004 01:24 PM |