 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
09-25-2009, 10:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
(non-man made) Print Error
I think the only variations listed as part of a set should be man made (then corrected) ones, not these missing letter/word ones where the printing plates were dirty. They are just print errors. 1958 Topps Herrer"a" is a good example. Its just a dirty printing plate..... Ive seen example with more of the "A" showing and also examples with some of the last "R" missing along with the "A". If you start listing all the "lack of quality control" print errors (ie T206 missing red ink, etc.) then the book will be 2X bigger. Within T206....... Nodgrass, Murr'y, Mitchell (Toront'), Shappe, etc. are all print errors too and should not be listed as a variation. IMO 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1956 Aaron line variation??? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-31-2008 12:10 PM |
| 1956 Ford variation question | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 07-28-2008 08:02 AM |
| Errors & Variation Discoveries Thread | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-24-2008 09:04 PM |
| It is time for me to sell my 1956 Topps Master set to work on another quest | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-13-2007 06:41 AM |
| The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |
Threaded Mode