 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
08-30-2009, 04:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm no expert. The R is a bit different than others I've seen. I would still vote authentic on it though for whatever that's worth. I have 2 Roush sigs and it's pretty similar (assuming mine are both good!) I think we must assume that no autograph is 100% alike everytime someone signs. He had many decades of signing, so subtle differences will arise.
I vote real.
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Edd Roush Autograph - Personal Check | John V | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 05-31-2009 08:52 AM |
| Great Article @ Baseball Autograph Fraud | danc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-07-2009 07:11 PM |
| Beckett Comments on Upper Deck cut autograph cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-21-2009 06:47 PM |
| Autograph Authentication Questions about PSA and a 1915 letter | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-22-2005 06:40 PM |
| When's an autograph an autograph | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-19-2004 09:01 AM |
Threaded Mode