 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-11-2009, 05:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That Tribune Wood is amazing, Todd. Thanks for posting it.
Although not really a card, Smokey Joe is also featured in the M101-2 set: 
Last edited by Jason Carota; 06-11-2009 at 05:59 PM. Reason: Spelling 
|
|
#2
06-11-2009, 06:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
forgot this one
m101-6
|
|
#3
06-11-2009, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Erick beat me to the D381s, but I'll put up a 1914 and a 1915:
|
|
#4
06-11-2009, 08:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No Roush in the 207's, but a little Wood, well, ...
__________________
T207's - Sale/Trade Info T207 image collections @ ImageEvent. T207 Master/Master - stopped at 676/705 - 96%..
|
|
#5
06-17-2009, 03:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just adding to the "Smokey" parade. My M116 Wood
|
|
#6
06-18-2009, 10:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Both the Wood and Roush card in the Cracker Jack sets are tough. Roush is a high number and only in the 1915 set. As such I would doubt anyone would get these signed as even low grade examples now sell for a few hundred.
The game cards would and should have been more available and certainly worth a lot less but Roush isn't in them. I happen to have a WG4 Wood and a Cracker Jack Roush for sale :-) I know when I was getting a lot of stuff signed in the 1990s I would find something other then a vintage card as I felt they were two different things and there were enough reprint cards that would hold a signature very nicely. As stated there is a huge difference in value between a vintage signature and modern one. James G
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
