 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-11-2009, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
-
Last edited by Vintagedegu; 08-21-2014 at 02:29 PM. 
|
|
#2
06-11-2009, 11:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That might be correct about the Woolly Mammoth hair card being more reliable. For positive verification, the scientist only has to narrow it down to the species. I would assume there are many qualified experts out there who can verify the species of animal, especially considering there aren't many hairy elephants walking around anymore.
Last edited by drc; 06-11-2009 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
#3
06-11-2009, 11:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sounds like it might be easier to authenticate a witch's prayer blanket than 150-year old hair...
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
