Beware one Goodwin Auction Item - update

[Bosox Blair]

Very nice work!

You know, I'll differ from the other guys - I would have been interested in a card that had Hall-of-Famer Hooper on it too. There are fewer Red Sox cards of Hooper than some others, as he was not included in T-206, T-205, T-201, T-202, or any of the early E-card sets prior to Cracker Jack.

Of course I agree that Ruth is the big draw, but I think it is quite material that an advertised Hall-of-Famer is actually not on the item.

Cheers,
Blair

[bmarlowe1]

I respect everone's opinion on how this effects the value. I mainly just want board members to know what they're really bidding on.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by Bosox Blair

Very nice work!

You know, I'll differ from the other guys - I would have been interested in a card that had Hall-of-Famer Hooper on it too. There are fewer Red Sox cards of Hooper than some others, as he was not included in T-206, T-205, T-201, T-202, or any of the early E-card sets prior to Cracker Jack.

Of course I agree that Ruth is the big draw, but I think it is quite material that an advertised Hall-of-Famer is actually not on the item.

Cheers,
Blair

This is true Blair, however my point is that it won't make any difference in price because having Ruth on the card trumps having Hooper and no one will pay more for it because of Hooper's presence.