![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Ted,
As you know.... The Johnson was part of a group of about 30 cards which didn't make it all the way through the printing process. Most of these "printer's scraps" only received the first 2-3 colors of the process, thus they appear as black and yellow with a touch of brown. I don't consider any of these proofs, only printer's scrap.... Be well Brian ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got it guy....I now know the difference between "proofs" and "scraps".
See, you can teach an old dinosaur new tricks.... ![]() Be good, TED Z |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Ted,
I'm sure we could start another thread on the "definition of a proof" and get at least a hundred different opinions... Be well Brian PS I want to be the one to find the 3rd Piedmont Wagner... ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather than getting into discussions in the realm of epistemological verifiability, i'm thinking it might be more prudent to create the thread on
definitions of 'scraps' instead, BW. ![]() best, barry |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Barry,
Leave that lingo in the classroom.... ![]() ![]() Hope you are well, Brian ![]() PS Now Barry sloate can come on and correct my use of commas.....,,,,,, ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
backatcha buddy.
best, barry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand Greek......but...."epistemological verifiability" is beyond my comprehension.
Professor, please elucidate ? T-Rex TED |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Johnson was part of a group of about 30 cards which didn't make it all the way through the printing process. Most of these "printer's scraps" only received the first 2-3 colors of the process, thus they appear as black and yellow with a touch of brown."
There are only about 30 of these yellow and brown printer's scrap exist?? They are rarer than Wagner then ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|