![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess I really am approaching this from an old school angle. If you stop to think about it, the grading companies did that, too. They only use the known parlance, but add qualifiers like "near" to mint -- kind of like adding an 11 to the volume knob.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd put NM back in and go with this 5 point scale:
5. Mint 4. NM 3. EX 2. VG 1. Poor/Fair The gap in condition between EX and Mint is too big to leave NM out IMO, otherwise I think your scale is on point. Last edited by Doug; 05-05-2009 at 06:42 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find it interesting that your Trader Speaks grade chart does not mention centering at all.
__________________
t205 midgrade and always looking for M101-2 Sporting News Supplements |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|