![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Doug
From what I understand, they started the separate line labeling the same time as the half grades so you could tell if a card was graded before or after the new system. Your card looks like it has a better shot at a bump that mine did, but I kind of wonder if submitting it in the new style holder may have caused them to skip over it instead of giving it a better look. I could see it going either way but I saw a 3.5 '52 common that had worse creasing than my Mantle and it didn't seem to keep it from getting a bump. I was hoping for a 3.5 when I originally crossed it over from the BVG holder, but that was a bit of a strange experience in itself. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want Topps Mickey Mantle Cards | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 08-03-2008 08:25 AM |
1933 Goudey Babe Ruth, 1956 Topps Mickey Mantle, 1953 Bowman Color Mickey Mantle for trade | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 04-07-2008 06:48 PM |
FS: Mickey Mantle Cards | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 09:09 AM |
Help with Mickey Mantle Rookie Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-21-2007 05:55 AM |
Wanted Mickey Mantle Cards | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-31-2006 01:09 PM |