![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mac Wubben
I have an interesting 54 Topps card...it seems to be made out of plastic/fiberglass stock...much stronger and heavier than a regular card. Print looks almost identical, but maybe slightly larger? It doesn't strike me that it's a fake...wonder if anybody else knows anything about these. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
it is probably a collector issue from the last 20 years. they are lincensed issues but have little collector value. post a scan and someone will be able to ID i'm sure. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mac Wubben
Here is a scan. The printing is identical, except for slightly elongated on the fiberglass version. Anybody ever seen one like this? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
definitely not what i expected from the original post, looks like it was laminated or painted over with lacquer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mac Wubben
But the proportions are off too...if you line up the blue on the sleeve, the letters on the standard card barely come up the the bottom of the letters on the strange one. The material is different, it doesn't have anything applied...simply printed on a differt material. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Red
With a 15-20 power magnifying glass look at the printing in the white area of the Orioles logo top right. The white needs to be solid white with no faint yellow and red dots, and the Orioles text needs to be a solid black and not made up of colored dots. Under magnification it needs to look just like the card beside it does and this will be the easiest place to spot if it's just a modern copied image printed out on another surface. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I have examine the printing closely...under a loupe...not 20x power. It really would be an astounding fake...the print cross lines match up perfectly. I find it hard to imagine that someone would take a common 54, duplicate it perfectly, except make it 3% longer than a standard card (same width). Anybody have a theory other than it being a fake? Anybody know of any material testing done by Topps or salesman samples? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Red
The fact that it is larger isn't a positive as that would mean Topps took the means to print a standard card and enlarged it slightly to print on a piece of fiberglass. Could it have happened, sure. But it's far more likely that somebody messing around recently scanned the card into a computer and printed it out. If this occurred then close examination of the printing will determine if it's likely to be a real Topps test piece or just somebody today messing around. The black text needs to be solid. White areas have to be solid white with no tiny yellow and red dots under magnification. Lines lining up don't mean anything, it's what kind of printing was used to make those lines. Anybody collecting this sort of thing would very much like to see it be the real thing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave Hornish
Mac, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale- Mickey Mantle cards 1957 Topps, 1960 Topps, 1963 Topps, and 1966 Topps | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-01-2009 12:51 AM |
1957 Topps, 1962 Topps, 1960 Topps and 1954 Topps (Moved to Auction and Shows) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 01-04-2009 07:12 PM |
1971 Topps ghost card | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 06-25-2008 03:15 PM |
What is the rarest Topps card? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 44 | 08-12-2007 08:53 PM |
Topps Authentic Bat Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 08-30-2004 12:08 PM |