![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: danny
I would like to know if these cards are authentic and what they are worth I really appreciate the help as I am new to this hobby. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
Cant tell for sure but does not look right to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
The trimmed PeeWee Reese might be the only legit card in the lot. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Most of them don't look authentic to me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steven Finley
I'm not one to judge, but you claim to know nothing of the hobby and then throw out some of the most marquee prewar cards out there. Could they be real? Possibly. Like Dan stated before, the Pee Wee Reese is horribly trimmed so yeah... possibly. But for the rest... Not so much. Your Ruth Goudeys have green bleed on the back that isn't evident on other graded examples. You have a 48 and 51 Bowman example, and those are two of the most reprinted sets on Ebay. Paige's rook, Delong Gehrig, and a 38 Goudey Dimaggio. Come on! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
It is not Paige's rookie card but you can compare what a real one looks like. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Smith
The no. 144 Ruth looks like it might have had "reprint" erased from under the words "Indian Gum" on the back while the no. 181 Ruth looks like it might have had "reprint" whited out from after the words "Goudey Gum Co." on the back. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony S.
You can tell the #144 Ruth is a reprint because there's no space between the top of his hat and the top border. If it were authentic you'd be able to see a small strip of yellow above the cap. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
reese looks good but the others are all reprints. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
I concur with the others - the Reese appears authentic, but is severely trimmed. The others are bad reprints. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Not authentic, except for Reese. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Believe what you read in this thread. Our members are correct. best regards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
A genuine 1949 Bowman Satchell Paige would have a gray back with red and blue print. Yours is white with black print. Looks like just about every card there is a fake. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris Counts
For me, the most obvious sign that they're fakes is that each card (except the Reese, which looks real) has the exact same perfectly rounded corners ... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt Miller
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Uh Matt, the cards shown (with the exception of the very badly trimmed and worthless PeeWee Reese card) are all fake. If the guy who posted these backed out on a sale with you over these cards who could blame him? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
Those are some of the worst fakes I have seen in a long time! Did you make them yourself Matt? Funny that you are trying to publicly criticize someone for not wanting to buy your stuff when it is all homemade junk. Mr. Regan is lucky he came here and didn't just take you word for it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt Miller
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
You wanted us to be aware of the people who wanted information on your cards so that we could know that they don't want to buy your fakes??? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Geez where do these people come from? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric B
Funny how he mentions that some of the 225 may be fake, but when he scanned a small subset, they all were fake except for a trimmed worthless one. Geez, you'd think he would at least scan the best ones. Or maybe he did. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
This really does help show that fact is stranger than fiction. Who could make this stuff up, it's great!! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay wolt
The entertainment value of this board is priceless. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony S.
"Are these cards fake?" |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
"I suggested the buyers be satisfied that the cards are real". |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
and with apologies to Monty Python: |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
"These are not the droids you're looking for" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
Easy one.... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
my vote is fake.. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
Who is Ernest Borgnine? |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Fred C
Danny, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Authentic cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-17-2007 07:37 AM |
authentic cards??? Help Please. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-16-2006 10:51 PM |
Cracker Jack Cards Authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-10-2005 11:48 AM |
Does GAI Grade cards as Authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-08-2005 09:40 PM |
Need help. Are these vintage cards authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-31-2002 01:30 AM |