![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
It seems insane to me. Just one more 1979 Topps Rose graded at a 10 will drastically hurt the value of the one that just sold but I have to believe the BUYER is not purchasing for investment but rather to have the highest grade possible. If the buyer never intends to sell, then does it really matter what the market value is? PS> I would LOVE to own those pre WAR (PSA9 and 10) cards.. wow.. incredible. I can see the fascination with such beauties!!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
T206 low pop high grade | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-14-2006 10:11 AM |
1963 Topps Commons High Numbers + A Few Low #'s All Near Mint | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 07-09-2006 07:39 PM |
Re: low grade e97 commons for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 07-31-2005 04:15 PM |
Wanted Low Grade T206 commons | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2005 01:22 AM |