![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: sagard
This is a classic case where the market will decide if it's a valuable variation. Ted is obviously correct on how the difference between the cards was created. I tend to agree with Red that the card missing the final dark blue, makes an interesting card with the "C" exposed. However I likely wouldn't offer a premium for the card with the "C" on the hat, but I wouldn't begrudge those who would pay it or those who try to market it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948 Leaf vs. 1949 Leaf? | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 03-31-2009 04:54 AM |
1949 Leaf | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 05-30-2008 01:06 PM |
1948 or 1949 Leaf | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-16-2008 06:32 AM |
1949 Leaf question?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-19-2006 05:01 PM |
1949 Leaf set - NOT 1948!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 04-11-2005 12:23 PM |