![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
I agree that the borders look narrow, & that the e90-1 micsuts are usually top/bottom borders. I just think the corners on the Lajoie look like natural wear. Like I mentioned its hard to tell without having the card in hand. Also, I think Bob & the crew at SGC are pretty good at spotting trims. Sure, I could be wrong, maybe SGC messed up, but I think its probably ok IMHO. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(1) Trimmed T205 and (1) Trimmed T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2008 11:54 AM |
Ever Wondered What A Colgan's Chip Looked Like? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-12-2008 08:52 AM |
E90-1 Lajoie to Trade for E101-Bender-Tinker-Lajoie-Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-14-2008 10:44 PM |
does this sgc holder looked tampered with? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-21-2005 04:00 PM |
I just looked at the t206's listed on ebay and...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-10-2005 01:37 PM |