![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Technically classifying these as E94 is incorrect, I don't care who says otherwise (at least to me). Now, if we are talking about what the masses go by then I would say it could be considered correct as E94. Sort of like the E97 black and white proofs...that aren't even close to being proofs but are still labeled as such. I think we need to give our friends at SGC a call on these |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
for trade: e94/m131 speaker sgc 40, '15 Cracker Jack Matty SGC 70 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 04-15-2009 12:37 PM |
M131 New Discovery | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-17-2008 02:29 PM |
wanted: m131 hof'er f--->g, e94 cobb g-vg | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2007 07:46 PM |
Speaking of M131... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-17-2006 12:42 PM |
Looking for a M131 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 10-27-2005 08:38 PM |