![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Cmoking, when the "1883," "1901" and "1930" calendars share the exact same calendar text font and line style, it's not wild speculation to guess they aren't really from 1883, 1901 and 1930. That the matching-font calendars are being offered on eBay on the same day by the same seller doesn't make it look better. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1930 Goudey- Babe Ruth- questionable authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 01-11-2021 06:17 PM |
Only One Appearance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-26-2008 06:41 PM |
Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-31-2007 10:26 AM |
Hopeful conclusion to the 1930 Goudey Ruth saga...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 103 | 03-28-2007 02:19 PM |
1930 Goudey Calender | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-21-2006 06:25 AM |