![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark Holt
The thumbnail images on PSA's is an improvement and they still have many features that are better than the favored company on this board IMO. HOF sets and links to pop reports to name two. I have sets on both registries and like both companies. My images are clear on PSA's sets and not so much on SGC's. The gallery view on SGC still hangs up about halfway through my sets. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Complete 1914 Cracker Jack Set on the PSA Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-06-2008 07:01 AM |
PSA Set Registry Calculations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-23-2007 11:32 AM |
PSA or SGC Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-20-2007 04:47 PM |
PSA Review/Set Registry Special | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-17-2006 07:58 PM |
PSA Set Registry calendar | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-11-2006 07:55 PM |