 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
05-15-2008, 07:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Truly undergraded or trimmed?
Posted By: Eric Brehm
I think Steve is probably right. In my experience, cards graded EX 5 that appear sharp enough at arm's length for a higher grade have some small flaw that is difficult to detect, such as a small wrinkle or bit of paper loss. As the seller points out, the centering isn't bad enough, in and of itself, to preclude a NM rating. Seeing a larger scan of the card might help. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (1) Trimmed T205 and (1) Trimmed T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2008 11:54 AM |
| SOLD - 1949 Bowman Satchell Paige HOF RC (PSA 1) UNDERGRADED!!! | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-25-2007 04:26 AM |
| e93 trimmed or not trimmed? please help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-13-2006 09:23 PM |
| trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-17-2005 11:40 AM |
| This has got to be trimmed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-20-2004 02:31 PM |
Threaded Mode