 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
05-07-2008, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Another PSA mislabel
Posted By: Dave Haas
I bought this card along with 30+ other Exhibits from a fellow board member and it was graded when I received it. I admittedly didn't notice the difference from std 1921's until I had a 2nd card to compare it to, even though the difference is obvious to Exhibit collectors. My only point is when you pay to have a card graded it is expected that the grading company gets at least the year it was produced right. I expect the same service from my investment banker, lawn service and pest control company. Granted the card is worth more as a 1923-24, which hopefully the board member who sold it to me won't want a cut of, so I'm not upset. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
| FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |
| PSA Mislabel | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-02-2006 10:13 PM |
| Another PSA mislabel.................... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-07-2002 02:37 PM |
Threaded Mode