 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
05-07-2008, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Another PSA mislabel
Posted By: Red
This is a good example of buying the card, not the label. Although PSA goofed in their id of the card, you also goofed when buying it, owning it, and not noticing it until now. I realize there's an expectation for them to be perfect but mistakes like this will always occur, especially on something that wasn't immediately apparent to a collector of the issue. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
| FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |
| PSA Mislabel | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-02-2006 10:13 PM |
| Another PSA mislabel.................... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-07-2002 02:37 PM |
Threaded Mode