![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Well, I've never been good with percentages, for some reason--can't get my head around them easily. 35% does look kind of like the goofy premium estimates in the old SCD books. Maybe what I meant was 300% of a typical common. That makes a lot of the tougher backs in the range of 1000% premium. And I'm sticking with about 5% for the total Gimbels % of M101-4. Not that anybody has any way of knowing for sure. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANTED: M101-5 Commons & Stars | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-01-2007 07:19 PM |
What's the premium for Piedmont 42 backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-21-2006 05:38 PM |
Sporting News M101-4 and M101-5 Company Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-27-2006 09:41 PM |
M101-5 & M101-4 known backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-09-2003 12:26 PM |
t206 Hofer's w/rare backs vs. Commons w/rare backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-03-2003 10:39 AM |