![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe_G.
I'm not sure how easily SGC will be able to fix the "blurry" issue. As I stated above, they re-size whatever you send them to fit the new format. It would help if they could give us guidelines on how to best minimize scan quality degradation during their re-size process. For example, if we wish to scan a normal size slab, is it best to scan at a multiple of 75dpi (150 dpi or 300 dpi) such that re-sizing is at 50% (or 25%) etc. ?? Most of my Old Judges were scanned at an odd-ball 114 dpi and now look very blurry after they re-sized them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-18-2008 08:11 AM |
SGC Type Card Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-06-2003 12:35 PM |
SGC Set Registry II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-13-2003 01:27 AM |
SGC set registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-24-2002 02:01 PM |
SGC Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-29-2002 05:04 PM |