![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
The one thing missing from this story is why SGC demanded a release before sending the card back to its owner. Even when the owner is dissatisfied with the grade, standard procedure is to send the card back to the owner. After all, it is his card. From SGC's statement, it looks like the owner must have been alleging that SGC damaged the card. But even so, I doubt that gave SGC the right to hold a card hostage while demanding a release. It's his property, and if he has some crazy theory that SGC damaged it, he can try to prove it in court. The fact that he sent it back to SGC for a second look should not give SGC the right to hold his card hostage until he gives up his legal claims. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quick Question on photo of 1957 Hank Bauer debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 04-21-2008 02:40 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 08:27 PM |
Scotty Elkins debacle- paid | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-16-2006 09:56 AM |
Bushing's latest debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 05-11-2005 04:48 PM |