![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
a better of a year ago , I sold a Sullivan in an 8 for 125.00. These prices arent evn close anymore. What do many think of the increase of popularity of the cards? What do you like like about them? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andrew S.
I saw a raw common go for over $200 on eBay in December that was only in excellent condition. They just keep going up in value. Some of the "commons" must be a lot rarer than the price guides indicate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
i never used to like these cards...they seemed kinda washed out...drab! They have definitely grown on me in recent times...the muted colors...earthy tones...the monochromatic look...the images are quite beautiful. And the levels of scarcity also add to the allure. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Neal
I just love these cards. This is all I am currently collecting. My collection has grown to over 40 cards in the past few months. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
It seems to me that this set is much like the T207 in that collectors either love it or hate it, although perhaps with the M116 the feelings are not as shaply divided as with the 207s. The M116 set has a lot of room to grow as it was definitely underpriced for a long, long time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
...for a time, but what I found difficult to negotiate were the discrepancies in condition. Given how M116 was packaged and distributed, you have a number of really fine condition ones that were preserved over time. So, you end up with a skewed distribution of conditions. In short, the fact that there are so many fine condition ones out there makes it a little less interesting to collect. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
McQuillan based on sales prices for the Cin VS. Phila is a huge difference. An SGC 10 Phil goes for about $10.00 and the CIN $567.00 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
You asked......"How much rarer is the Cincinnati variation on the McQuillan?" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
Thanks, Bobby and Ted. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Probably the second toughest card in the set only the McConnell Chcago is tougher. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B.C.Daniels
those come from Mark? I used to own all of those minus the SGC one.... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Neal
Yes that is correct! Mark is a good guy! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 question - cigarette popularity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-17-2008 01:56 PM |
E107 Popularity Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-21-2006 05:34 PM |
Deadball Hofer Collectible Popularity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 04-22-2006 05:13 PM |
E90-3 popularity..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2006 07:51 PM |
T202 popularity questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-11-2005 10:48 AM |