![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I don't post many of these but so many folks get fooled by this series I feel it's a good thing to post, every now and then. Guaranteed 100% fake... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
anyone have a real version of this card? i don't collect this series, but its always good to see a comparison- or- leon, how can you tell its a fake? what should we be looking for? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank B
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
It's indeed a fake. There was a thread long ago with comparison photos, it'll take a while. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Much appreciated. This series and the Fro Joys are the most common fakes on ebay. When you hold one of these fakes you can feel the paper and it sort of has a rough feel to it. Eighty year old paper has a smooth feel to it.....Plus, as has been said, the grainy look is a bad sign...regards |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
I haven't dealt in cards in over 15 years, but certainly recall the Fro Joy fakes from many years ago. I can't believe this is still an issue. If knowledge of these fakes was common 20 years ago, how can this still be problematic? I seem to remember the Fro Joys typically being offered in uncut sheet format. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
One easy way I always use is to look at the number in the circle. On most of the fakes if not all, the number is obviously much smaller. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam
Good old Stew, he loves buying these cards. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony S.
I love that Stew's feedback is "private." I imagine these scammers leave some pretty colorful feedback once they realize they didn't reel in a live one. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richie
well 80% feedback. he ruffled a few feathers i would imagine. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glen V
While we're playing, and learning... I've always thought these were real. Agree? Why? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I don't like the looks of the 1928 Candy card with Ruth swinging. It might just be the picture but that aging on the front is what a lot of fakes have looked like.....The rest look ok from the scans, to me....You have great experience surely you can tell? I still need a V122 also |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed Ivey
Does Stew P. Dazzo sign baseballs? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
I agree with Leon on this one, plus I have yet to see a real one without the ad on back though Bill Mastro will argue that point and he could be right and I am wrong. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAREFUL, well done FATIMA FAKES | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 04-10-2008 10:35 AM |
CAREFUL FAKES and DECEIPT | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 11-08-2007 02:05 PM |
Careful gents, this one is not as it seems | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-25-2007 06:17 PM |
be careful what you wish for; you may not like the result | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-18-2003 10:57 AM |
Be Careful- Please read | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-13-2002 08:34 PM |