![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PC
Kevein -- maybe it's semantics, but rebacking implies that the original back was removed and replaced. Isn't it more likely that the front and backs of these cards were produced separately, and then not sized properly, or were glued together poorly? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Low Grade T206 Hindu Backed Cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-22-2009 09:28 PM |
WTB: T206 Lenox or Red Hindu backed HOFer | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-25-2008 12:28 PM |
WANTED: T206 Chance (red) and T206 Sweeney Bost. and T206 Mullin Mullen | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-06-2008 07:47 PM |
T206 Chance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-22-2008 08:38 AM |
T206 Chance Factory 42 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-09-2006 08:48 AM |