![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Eric, I agree with you. These numbers are pretty important at all grades so why not figure out a way to show them all? What is most troubling about the pop reports, obviously, is that due to the crack outs/resubmissions, etc. the numbers are certainly higher than what reality is. Considering how the values of cards go up as the pop numbers go down, a false reading will cause the value of a particular card at a particular grade to go down due to the falsely inflated number, perhaps to never recover. Other than typos, you don't have situations where the pop reports underrepresent the population of a card at a particular grade. It's a shame that such an important factor on certain significant cards might be forever skewed, thus forever falsely impacting values. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T-206 honus wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 01-12-2009 09:27 AM |
D322 Wagner PSA 3 - Valuation question? | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 15 | 04-18-2008 09:34 PM |
Another T-206 Wagner surfaces in Michigan, SURE!!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-16-2007 08:48 PM |
T206 PSA 8 Wagner Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 08-15-2006 08:55 PM |
Why the Wagner T-206? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-03-2006 09:51 AM |