 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35
10-07-2007, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
'33 Benny Bengough vs. '52 Andy Pafko
Posted By: Kenneth A. Cohen
I would question the supposition that the quality of the player is not a key factor in the worth of the cards being discussed. Yes, these cards are extremely high worth in spite of the less than hall of fame careers of the players. But wouldn't their worth be substantially greater if - for example - the Goudey #1 was one of the Ruths or Gehrigs, or if '52 Topps #1 was Mays? Wouldn't there be a compounding effect of several price multiples given the combination of interest in the set, card #1, AND star quality of the player? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Great Selling on Ebay - 52 topps Pafko | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 03-03-2009 03:00 PM |
| 1933 benny bengough question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-30-2008 12:27 PM |
| #1 Benny Bengough | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-03-2007 07:59 AM |
| 1952 Topps Andy Pafko #1 PSA 6 NQ | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-20-2007 09:55 PM |
| 1933 Goudey #1 Benny Bengough | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-10-2004 02:42 PM |
Threaded Mode