 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
04-10-2007, 01:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Fred C
I guess people should consider changing the terminology to FIRST CARD. That would eliminate having to distinguish between a MAJOR or minor league card. I wonder if A-Rods parents had any of those little league cards made when he was a kid? I guess that would be considered his first card. As for Stengel, it would be T210. Oh yeah, what's a card? T206 are small, the traditional size card of 1957 (and later) Topps. I guess the opinion of a ROOKIE card depends upon what it is you have in your collection. The definitions are really mind boggling here... Are cut outs from boxes considered cards? Look at W555 or Orange borders? Are they cards or cut outs? Blah.... 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
| Marquard & Bush "Rookie" Cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-24-2008 10:49 AM |
| What is considered to be "Lefty" Groves rookie card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-20-2007 05:19 AM |
| Last night's "debate" .....some interesting observations. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-25-2004 06:52 PM |
| Speaking of Harry Hooper, what is his "rookie?" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-25-2002 01:35 PM |
Threaded Mode