![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Silver King
The first card I ever purchased was an OJ N172 SGC 40. I didn't know anything about grading or old judges or really anything about these old cards. I only bought the card because it was a family member. When I got the card I thought it was great that I found it but I was dissappointed because it looked faded to me. I just assumed that all cards from the set were like that. Later on I found two more authentic cards, one with pin holes and the other with a crease. These two cards are a thousand times nicer to me because you can actually make out the details in the picture. In a prior post I mentioned that perhaps there should be different numbers assigned to different categories but the bottom line is that it's still just an arbitrary number. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading blank backed cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-06-2008 03:38 PM |
WTB E97 blank back cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2007 10:45 PM |
T204 Back Type Cards, RAMLY, TTT, BLANK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 01-26-2007 09:48 AM |
14 B&W Blank Back Photo Baseball Cards, 3.25 x 5.25 inches | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-15-2005 04:33 PM |
Grading vintage cards with back damage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2004 07:03 PM |