 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-14-2007, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Legal issues in the hobby
Posted By: P Spaeth
As to your other point, if the auction house is not entitled to rely on the third-party opinion but instead is held to a duty to independently authenticate, then at least in this context how "meaningful" is the third-party opinion? It seems to me, because it is difficult to articulate partial duties, one must either take the position that the third-party opinion absolves the auction house of duties except in the case of red flags; or the auction house has a duty to independently authenticate certain types of material, in which case the third-party opinion has no legal effect. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1975 trader speaks hobby mag 12 issues | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 05-24-2008 05:29 PM |
| NYC Conference to Discuss Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-12-2007 04:51 AM |
| Memory Lane's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-06-2007 08:11 PM |
| Andy Madec Sportscards Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2006 08:58 PM |
| Clean Sweep's Stance on Larger Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-29-2006 10:56 AM |
Threaded Mode