![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joseph
Given all the recent discussion on "The Card," I think it's time to run the numbers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason L
I think... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I'll say 3 or 4. It was almost certainly cut from a sheet originally, but on what basis can we determine it was cut again? That is just speculation. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark Lutz
If Barry means 3 or 4, I agree with him. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
3 or 4 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
3 or 4 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
4 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
3 and most likely 4 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andrew
3 or 4 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
If everyone is right, what an incredible tragedy that the only surviving T206 sheet was cut up. Do you think Topps or Upper Deck may have been involved? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joseph
Paul: that's another of the great ironies of the book, "The Card." If Mastro knew there existed |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
4, although 5 would be awfully interesting. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
3 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
Being that I haven't held the card, being the sceptic that I am...I'll be the first.. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe brennan
I believe it's real, was cut from a printers sheet in 1909, was inserted in a pack. Put away in pristine condition and was found in it's original condition and graded by PSA just the way it came off the press in 1909. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
Bet that was a surprise to most on here! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ErlandStevens
Somebody has to be the lemming. I'll say 1. I mean if it weren't real, then it wouldn't be slabbed! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rand
the guy that bought the SGC 96 Nagurski for $240,000 had it crossed to a psa 9. psa actually put in a full page ad in the June & July SMR to show off their new prize, wouldnt it be great if the "Card" was sent to SGC for their opinion? Gai would give it a 9 "1rst graded" so there is no challenge on that one. oh..wait..PRO that would work. a PRO 9 Wagner. where are those guys from the TV article? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe brenan
Somebody has to be the lemming. I'll say 1. I mean if it weren't real, then it wouldn't be slabbed! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David F
Well....if it's not real, and it were to ever land on the property of SGC, there is no way in hell that SGC would ever do anything other than grade the card in an equivalent crossover grade. Just no way. I know many people's opinions here are that SGC can do no wrong...but bringing down the highest dollar, most well known card in the industry would not be the move SGC would make...even if they actually found the card to be trimmed by their own experts....it would make it into an SGC 88 or heck even a 92 slab. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
most likely 4 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DJ
I would say 4 or 5 as well. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
I wanted to be the first to vote for "6". |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeU
"Well....if it's not real, and it were to ever land on the property of SGC, there is no way in hell that SGC would ever do anything other than grade the card in an equivalent crossover grade. Just no way. I know many people's opinions here are that SGC can do no wrong...but bringing down the highest dollar, most well known card in the industry would not be the move SGC would make...even if they actually found the card to be trimmed by their own experts....it would make it into an SGC 88 or heck even a 92 slab." |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeU
In line with Ashphalt Man's statement, I am willing to personally contribute $1,000 to a pot that NET54/Leon or some other party could collect from various members to give to SCP/West Coast Owner to submit "The Card" to SGC for crossover reveiw. This is contigent on the SGC results being published. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
Mike...I really believe IMO your fooling yourself if you think SGC would grade that card as authentic after the whole history behind it and the nation recognition it has receieved...just plain no way. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeU
"Mike...I really believe IMO your fooling yourself if you think SGC would grade that card as authentic after the whole history behind it and the nation recognition it has receieved...just plain no way." |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
4, |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: shelly jaffe
Why use SCG. Why not get the top five people in the field of t206 and have them look at the card. If three out of five say its good or visa versa thats it. I do have one question. Is it possible to grade it without takeing it out of the slab? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
How could we get five people to look at it? Does anybody even know who owns it? |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeU
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Something tells me we won't be getting a hold of this card to look at it...but Luger's sounds like a great idea. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: shelly jaffe
Why does everything have to be on the East Coast. How about Spago's. If no one even looks at the card we can at least look at the women. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
It can be informally graded in a slab; that is, a professional grader can look at it and review it, or a hobby expert can render a realistic opinion. But you can't get that all important new label without the card first being removed from its holder. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: shelly jaffe
What a shame. I really thought that if you could measure and see the trimmed edges it would answere a lot of questions. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
They can only give an unofficial opinion if it's slabbed. They are supposed to study a card under proper lighting and magnification, and the plastic would prevent it. But I bet they could tell you at a quick glance if it were trimmed or not. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Since the points and counterpoints are driving me in circles, I choose |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 69399 37510 |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chuck Ross
3.14159 Traynor |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
I don't care. I really don't. None of my doggies are in the fight. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Chuck- that's a good one, I like that! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rain Man
Chicks dig guys who can recite pi to 12,000 places. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Barry if a quick glance in the slab were enough, wouldn't we have more opinions from people who have seen the card when it has been on display? Or has it been displayed in such a fashion that you can't get a good look? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: J Levine
I have told this story a few times and it can be found with a search here on net54. I have held the card as have other board members and lurkers I am sure. I vote for 3 and 4. Certainly 4. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimmy
I feel that if the card was graded today with the standards SGC and PSA use it would be a lower grade, we have come along way with understanding graded cards over the years. I think it is a real card, but we will never know if the card was ever trimmed, but it is a possibility that the card came from an old sheet and was cut later once it was discovered |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Fred C
I'll go with 4 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 PIEDMONT 460 Factory 42....update & survey | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 12-12-2008 01:42 PM |
What is the POPulation of PSA8 Pre-War collectors..SURVEY ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 09-24-2007 09:57 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner-Piedmont | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 08-19-2006 03:51 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner-Piedmont | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 08-12-2006 03:05 AM |
nice survey at the top caramel Wagner card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-28-2004 10:55 PM |